Category Archives: Copyright Law

New York Times v. Perplexity AI: Copyright, Hallucinations, and Trademark Risk



In this episode of The Briefing, Weintraub Tobin partners Scott Hervey and Matt Sugarman break down The New York Times v. Perplexity AI, a lawsuit that goes beyond copyright and into largely untested trademark territory. They discuss the Times’ allegations that Perplexity copied its journalism at both the input and output stages and, more significantly, that the AI attributed fabricated or inaccurate content to the Times using its trademarks. The case raises new questions about false designation of origin, trademark dilution, and how AI hallucinations could expose platforms to liability. Continue reading New York Times v. Perplexity AI: Copyright, Hallucinations, and Trademark Risk


Nudity Riders, Consent, and the Terrifier Lawsuit: What Producers Must Know



The Terrifier franchise is one of the most unlikely independent horror success stories of the last 25 years. But a new lawsuit challenges how the first film was made and raises serious questions about performer consent and on-set protections. In this episode of The Briefing, Weintraub Tobin partners Scott Hervey and Matt Sugarman break down actress Catherine Corcoran’s lawsuit against the film’s producers and what it reveals about SAG-AFTRA requirements for nudity and simulated sex scenes.
Continue reading Nudity Riders, Consent, and the Terrifier Lawsuit: What Producers Must Know


The Man In Black v. Coca Cola: The New Soundalike Showdown



Did Coca-Cola cross the line by using a Johnny Cash soundalike in its nationwide “Fan Work is Thirsty Work” campaign? In this episode of The Briefing, Weintraub Tobin attorneys Scott Hervey and Richard Buckley unpack the Cash estate’s lawsuit and what it reveals about the evolving law of soundalikes.

Continue reading The Man In Black v. Coca Cola: The New Soundalike Showdown


What Is Fair Use and Why Does It Matter? (Featured)



Creators, beware: just because it’s online doesn’t mean it’s fair game. In this episode of The Briefing, Scott Hervey and Richard Buckley break down one of the most misunderstood areas of copyright law—fair use.

Continue reading What Is Fair Use and Why Does It Matter? (Featured)


Turkey, Trademarks, and Thanksgiving Branding – IP Protection for Recipes and Holiday Traditions



Who really owns your Thanksgiving traditions? In this special holiday edition of The Briefing, Weintraub Tobin partners Scott Hervey and Richard Buckley discuss how intellectual property law intersects with holiday food, recipes, and branding. Continue reading Turkey, Trademarks, and Thanksgiving Branding – IP Protection for Recipes and Holiday Traditions


Soup for Change: Campbell’s Sues a Congressional Candidate



In this episode of The Briefing, Scott Hervey and Richard Buckley break down Campbell Soup Co. v. Campbell for Congress, the lawsuit over a political candidate’s “Soup4Change” slogan and AI-generated soup can design. They cover the backstory, the trademark and First Amendment arguments, and how the Hershey case may influence the court’s view of political campaign branding. Tune in for a clear look at where trademark law meets political speech.

Watch this episode on YouTube.


Protecting Fictional Characters: Copyright and Trademark Strategies



Can a car, a superhero, or even a cartoon sidekick be protected by copyright? In this episode of The Briefing, Scott Hervey and Matt Sugarman break down how fictional characters earn legal protection — and when they don’t.
 
From DC Comics v. Towle (the “Batmobile” case) to Carroll Shelby Licensing v. Halicki (the “Eleanor” case), Scott and Matt explore the three-part test for character copyrightability, how trademark rights can extend protection, and what creators and studios can do to safeguard their most valuable IP assets.

Continue reading Protecting Fictional Characters: Copyright and Trademark Strategies


George Santos vs. Jimmy Kimmel: Why the 2nd Circuit Sided with Comedy



Former Congressman George Santos sued Jimmy Kimmel after the late-night host used Cameo videos in a comedy segment called “Will Santos Say It?” Santos claimed copyright infringement and fraud, but both the District Court and the Second Circuit said Kimmel’s use was fair use. In this episode of The Briefing, Scott Hervey and Tara Sattler break down:
 
● How Kimmel obtained the videos using fake Cameo accounts
 
● Why the District Court dismissed Santos’s case
 
● How the Second Circuit reinforced that criticism and satire are protected under fair use
 
● Why Santos’s contract and fraud claims also failed
Watch this episode on YouTube.

Anthropic Settles AI Training Case for $1.5 Billion +



The Anthropic settlement shows just how costly copyright missteps can be in AI development. Anthropic has agreed to a $1.5B settlement after a court found that keeping a permanent library of pirated books was not fair use—even though training its AI model on those same works was.
 
On this episode of The Briefing, Weintraub attorneys Scott Hervey and Matt Sugarman discuss the ruling, the settlement, and what it means for future copyright claims against AI companies.

Continue reading Anthropic Settles AI Training Case for $1.5 Billion +


Publicity Rights and the Law – Using Real People in Your Work



Can you use a celebrity’s voice or image in your work? What about AI-generated versions? On this episode of The Briefing, Scott Hervey and Richard Buckley explore the right of publicity—how it protects names, likenesses, voices, and what happens when you cross the line.

Watch this episode on YouTube.

Continue reading Publicity Rights and the Law – Using Real People in Your Work